Report
to Bowie City Council
On Education Priorities
Executive Summary
Bowie Education
Committee
November 24, 2003
A review of the Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) voucher program which has existed for 15 years has yielded equivocal results. As is true in public schools, some students have obtained positive/improved results, others less so. The most generous conclusion to draw, based on the most solid of the studies1 (Rouse, 1997), is that voucher students performed no better than MPS students in reading and slightly outperformed MPS students in math. The same can be found in regard to Charter schools. For example, a recent survey of the results of eight years of charter schools in Massachusetts reveals that while many charter schools showed individual gains, they did not appear to out perform public schools, statewide2.
The conclusion from these and other studies seems clear: We cannot give up on our public schools - the schools in which most children are likely to be educated. If we give up on the public school system and place our faith and financial resources in vouchers, charter schools, and other alternatives, we run the risk of failing the majority of our school-aged children who may be unable to access these alternatives.
The recent Education Summit held at Bowie State University (Sept 13, 2003) stressed the importance of parental involvement to a child's successful academic achievement. Unfortunately, parents have less time, or sometimes less willingness to become involved in their child’s education. We need to find ways to increase parental involvement. We need to identify those societal factors that can have a negative impact on learning, and find ways to overcome them. Education must be a partnership between the schools and concerned, involved parents, and if we expect the schools to assume further responsibility for the care and education of our children, then we must be willing to provide the necessary financial resources.
Another factor crucial to academic success is having qualified/certified teachers in the classroom. Without qualified teachers, all the new schools and new classrooms being built are meaningless. We still have a large number of provisionally certified teachers in Prince George’s County and the state. The state needs to make certification a priority, if we want to insure that our children have the best teachers possible to prepare them for an ever-demanding world. We need to find ways to encourage our young people to consider teaching as a career.
PRIORITIES
Budget
The Prince
George’s County School System has operated with a severe budget disadvantage
for years.
· Each year the proposed budget is reduced through the budget reconciliation
process so that the system barely maintains the required “maintenance
of effort.”
· Each year the school system has an increase in the number of students being educated yet the budgetary increases are minimal, so that there is hardly enough money for the additional materials needed to accommodate this growth.
· Each year, as more programs, personnel, etc. are reduced or eliminated, there is no way to bring back valuable learning tools that have been cut in previous years.
Among the
program reductions due to budget cuts that have been brought to our attention
this year:
· Elementary schools have lost reading and math teachers (considered
to be Specialists, cut in the budget reconciliation process).
· Middle School Resource Officers have been removed. It is our understanding that the grant money was cut for Resource Officers in Middle Schools.
· There is no longer a Career Lab person at Bowie High School, as the budget has cut any personnel beyond those that fit within a limited-staffing formula.
· There is no longer a full time Peer Mediation person at Bowie High. We have determined that there is still a program in the schools, but it has been changed to a different model.
· Safe and Drug Free Schools programs have also faced budgetary shortfalls, which are cutting into the substance abuse and prevention programs. These have been very helpful services for students.
Funding of Other Programs and Initiatives
If students are going to be successful on the Maryland School Assessments (MSA) and the High School Assessments (HSA), the school system must fund training for teachers in areas in which they need additional skills. Research indicates that the level of teacher qualifications is the single greatest influence on student success.
Other items that need to be considered when looking at education funding are:
· Fully funding the Thornton "Bridge to Excellence in Public Schools Act" for equity in education funding across the state.
· Seeking creative ways of funding the school system budget and the CIP in order to reduce or eliminate the annual shortfalls.
School Construction and Repairs
The new elementary school on Northview Drive is on track to open in Aug 2005. Construction has already been pushed back several times for various reasons. The Cerebral Palsy Center has relocated from Whitehall Elementary, and renovation is scheduled to begin in spring. This school, too, is scheduled to open Aug 2005. We urge the Council to continue to insure that these projects continue, as scheduled, so that we can begin to provide relief to our overcrowded schools. As the following chart shows, a significant number of Bowie schools are severely over capacity.
2003 -2004
Bowie Area School Enrollment
School |
03/04
Enrollment |
St.
Capacity |
Over/
Under |
03/04
% Utili. |
02/03%
Util. |
% Change |
| Heather Hills E.S. | 457 |
347 |
110 |
131.70% |
139.20% |
-7.50% |
| High Bridge E.S. | 401 |
472 |
-71 |
79.54% |
89.20% |
-9.66% |
| Kenilworth E.S. | 583 |
619 |
-36 |
89.63% |
106.10% |
-16.47% |
| Pointer Ridge E.S. | 781 |
716 |
65 |
118.73 |
121.80 |
-3.07 |
| Rockledge E.S. | 639 |
519 |
120 |
134.58 |
120.20 |
14.38 |
| Samuel Ogle E.S. | 767 |
829 |
-62 |
82.13 |
93.20 |
-11.07 |
| Tulip Grove E.S. | 557 |
444 |
113 |
132.56 |
129.70 |
2.86 |
| Yorktown E.S. | 591 |
519 |
72 |
120.75 |
116.60 |
4.15 |
| Woodmore E.S. | 619 |
629 |
-10 |
97.12 |
96.70 |
.42 |
| Benjamin Tasker M.S. | 1513 |
1029 |
484 |
147.04 |
133.90 |
13.14 |
| Bowie H.S. | 2764 |
1934 |
830 |
142.92 |
131.60 |
11.32 |
| Tall Oaks Voca.HS | 160 |
100 |
60 |
117.29 |
174.00 |
-56.71 |
| Chapel Forge | 233 |
180 |
53 |
115.27 |
28.90 |
86.37 |
| C. Elizabeth Rieg | 89 |
120 |
-31 |
91.07 |
70.80 |
20.27 |
· Bladensburg High School is expected to move to its new facility in Aug 2005. Once again we may have the opportunity to regain this facility to use as either another middle school, or perhaps as an Annex to Bowie High.
· Air conditioning in schools is no longer a luxury! Increasing numbers of students suffer from allergies and asthma and miss many days of school because there is no air conditioning that would help in prevention of more serious problems.
· Heating systems need upgrading to meet the demands of larger populations, and electrical systems must be improved to meet the demands of computer use.
· If our schools are going to remain overcapacity, we need to insure that sufficient restroom facilities are available to students and staff – especially when many children are attending class in our so-called “temporary” buildings!
SUMMARY
As the preceding indicates, we see three major areas of concern which we feel are crucial for the Bowie City Council to focus on in the coming year: Budget, which affects programs available in the schools; Funding of Other Programs and Initiatives, which addresses overall operation of our schools, preparation for test success, and training of our teachers; and School Construction and Repairs, which addresses classroom overcrowding and providing a comfortable learning environment for our children.
As noted, it will be difficult to make much progress in these areas unless we can begin to convince parents, legislators, and businesses that their increased funding and support is worthwhile. Dr. Hornsby is beginning to focus on the positives in our schools. This is an important first step. No Child Left Behind establishes standards and goals to ensure that ALL children receive a basic education that will make them self-sufficient in an increasingly complex world. Achieving the goals of No Child Left Behind will require increased funding, resources, and commitment by all involved parties to assure success. This we should do! This we must do!
REFERENCES
1. Rouse,
Cecilia Elena, "Private School Vouchers and Student Achievement:
An Evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program," Princeton University,
September 1997
2. The Boston Globe, October 17, 2003.
Report to Bowie City Council
On Education Priorities
Bowie
Education Committee
November 24, 2003
INTRODUCTION
When Rep. Jim Marshall, D-Ga., returned from a visit to Iraq, he noted that he was surprised at the number of positive changes he saw in the country. He wondered whether the focus of the press on mainly the negative aspects of the occupation might be contributing to attacks on Coalition troops by making Iraqis reluctant to provide information to Coalition forces, and causing US citizen support for the reconstruction efforts to decline. When I heard his observations, I immediately thought of the Prince George’s County School system.
For years
we have read and heard about what is ‘wrong’ with our schools;
we rarely hear about what is ‘right’. Recall that last year’s
Jeopardy Teen Champion came from Eleanor Roosevelt High School in Prince George’s
County – not Montgomery County, not Howard County, not from some county
in northern Virginia – Prince George’s County, MD! We routinely
read about athletic achievements, but academic and artistic accomplishments
rarely get noticed. In a recent meeting with the Student Government at Bowie
High, this was one of the comments made by the students.
If we want our schools to be better, it will take a great deal of effort –
by the school system, by legislators who fund the schools, and by parents
who volunteer their time and get involved. But with all of the negative press
over the years, have we not created similar circumstances to those in Iraq?
Have parents given up on the system? Have legislators begun to feel that putting
more money into the system is not a cost-effective use of limited funds? Have
we caused businesses and private industries to look elsewhere to build because
of concern about the schools their children would attend if they moved to
Bowie or Prince George’s County?
Fortunately, one of CEO Hornsby’s initiatives as he begins his job is to focus on what is right with our schools – a focus the Education Committee has had for some time, as reflected in our Teacher of the Month program, our annual Excellence in Education banquet, and our scholarship program for promising Bowie students, among others.
If we hope to turn the school system around, we need to inform our citizens about the positive things that are happening in our schools. Only when citizens see the good things happening will they once again put some of their energy into volunteering. Only then will legislators be willing to provide greater financial support for our schools. Only then will citizens be willing to consider an additional tax burden – should that be necessary – to support education.
Alternatives to Public Schools
A review of the Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) voucher program, which has existed for 15 years, has yielded equivocal results. As is true in public schools, some students have obtained positive/improved results, others less so. The most generous conclusion to draw, based on the most solid of the studies1 (Rouse, 1997), is that voucher students performed no better than MPS students in reading and slightly outperformed MPS students in math. The same can be found in regard to Charter schools. For example, a recent survey of the results of eight years of charter schools in Massachusetts reveals that while many charter schools showed individual gains, they did not appear to outperform public schools, statewide2.
The conclusion from these and other studies seems clear: We cannot give up on our public schools - the schools in which most children are likely to be educated. If we give up on the public school system and place our faith and financial resources in vouchers, charter schools, and other alternatives, we run the risk of failing the majority of our school-aged children who may be unable to access these alternatives.
Test Performance
The low test performance results in our schools are not unique to Prince George's County. Similar problems are found in other parts of the country, as well. But that is of little consolation to those parents whose children are not academically competitive with children from other school systems in our area, or with children who attend private schools. It would seem that after nearly 150 years of public education we would have figured out what works by now - or we would have learned what is working in other school systems - and we would have implemented those successful strategies in schools across the nation. We frequently hear of new, innovative methods of teaching that are seen as the "magic bullet" to fix all of the system's ills, yet performance does not improve, or does so minimally. We must do better!
Not all of the poor academic performance is attributable to the schools, nor can the schools be responsible for fixing all of the problems. We are placing more demands on the school system to provide additional assistance - if not during the normal school day, then with before-and-after school programs, summer school, and other programs. While these programs are necessary in many cases, they are not an alternative to parental involvement.
The recent Education Summit held at Bowie State University (September 13, 2003) stressed the importance of parental involvement to a child's successful academic achievement. Unfortunately, due to societal, cultural, and other factors parents have less time, or sometimes less willingness to become involved in their child’s education. We need to find ways to increase parental involvement. We need to identify those societal factors that can have a negative impact on learning, and find ways to overcome them.
Education must be a partnership between the schools and concerned, involved parents, and if we expect the schools to assume further responsibility for the care and education of our children, then we must be willing to provide the necessary financial resources.
Qualified/Certified Teachers
Another factor crucial to academic success is having qualified/certified teachers in the classroom. Without qualified teachers, all the new schools and new classrooms being built are meaningless. We still have a large number of provisionally certified teachers in Prince George’s County and the state. The state needs to make certification a priority, if we want to insure that our children have the best teachers possible to prepare them for an ever-demanding world.
Construction is adding a significant number of new schools and classrooms to the school system. While these classrooms are sorely needed to reduce overcrowding in our schools – such as at Benjamin Tasker – we seem to be less successful than necessary at recruiting new teachers to the County and encouraging young people to consider teaching as a career.
Each year the State of Maryland graduates approximately 2,600 education majors, but only 1,800 or so actually begin teaching upon graduation – and not all in Maryland. However Maryland requires some 8,000 or so new teachers each year to replace retirees, teachers leaving the career or the state, or to staff new schools and classrooms. This requires a concerted effort each Spring and Summer to recruit teachers from surrounding states. How long can we continue to meet our needs in this way – especially when 50% or more of our current, baby-boom teachers will be retiring, or be retirement-eligible, in the next five years, or so? All of the new classrooms will be irrelevant if we can’t find sufficient, qualified teachers to staff them.
PRIORITIES
Budget
The Prince George’s County School System has been operating with a severe budget disadvantage for years.
The overall
picture is not great, as our school system continues to lag far behind neighboring
school systems in per pupil expenditures3.
In addition, the Anne Arundel County FY2003 Per Pupil expenditure was $8370,
and the Howard County per pupil expenditure was $8311.
While more dollars is not the only solution to our problems, it is interesting
to note that if we assume a current PGCPS enrollment of 134,000 students,
it would require an increase in the PGCPS annual budget of nearly $430,000,000
to compare to the per pupil expenditure in Montgomery County!
Among the program reductions due to budget cuts that have been brought to our attention this year:
Funding of Other Programs and Initiatives
If students
are going to be successful on the Maryland School Assessments (MSA) and the
High School Assessments (HSA), the school system must be able to fund training
for teachers in areas in which they need additional skills. Research indicates
that the level of teacher qualifications is the single greatest influence
on student success. We must train teachers to meet the challenges they are
facing if students are going to reach the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) expected
of them within the next ten years.
In the near future the State Board of Education will decide whether students
must pass the High School Assessments in order to graduate. This will have
a huge effect on many students who will need completely different types of
learning situations to prepare for these assessments. The state will also
need to develop a plan for supplemental learning experiences for those students
who have difficulty passing them.
Other items that need to be considered when looking at education funding are:
School Construction and Repairs
The new elementary school on Northview Drive is still on track for construction and is scheduled to open in August 2005. Construction has already been pushed back several times for various reasons. The Cerebral Palsy Center has relocated from Whitehall Elementary, and renovation is scheduled to begin in the spring of 2004. This school, too, is scheduled to open to students in August 2005. We urge the Council to continue to use their influence to insure that these projects continue, as scheduled, so that we can begin to provide relief to our overcrowded schools. As the following chart shows, a significant number of Bowie schools are severely over capacity.
2003 -2004
Bowie Area School Enrollment
School |
03/04
Enrollment |
St.
Capacity |
Over/
Under |
03/04
% Utili. |
02/03%
Util. |
% Change |
| Heather Hills E.S. | 457 |
347 |
110 |
131.70% |
139.20% |
-7.50% |
| High Bridge E.S. | 401 |
472 |
-71 |
79.54% |
89.20% |
-9.66% |
| Kenilworth E.S. | 583 |
619 |
-36 |
89.63% |
106.10% |
-16.47% |
| Pointer Ridge E.S. | 781 |
716 |
65 |
118.73 |
121.80 |
-3.07 |
| Rockledge E.S. | 639 |
519 |
120 |
134.58 |
120.20 |
14.38 |
| Samuel Ogle E.S. | 767 |
829 |
-62 |
82.13 |
93.20 |
-11.07 |
| Tulip Grove E.S. | 557 |
444 |
113 |
132.56 |
129.70 |
2.86 |
| Yorktown E.S. | 591 |
519 |
72 |
120.75 |
116.60 |
4.15 |
| Woodmore E.S. | 619 |
629 |
-10 |
97.12 |
96.70 |
.42 |
| Benjamin Tasker M.S. | 1513 |
1029 |
484 |
147.04 |
133.90 |
13.14 |
| Bowie H.S. | 2764 |
1934 |
830 |
142.92 |
131.60 |
11.32 |
| Tall Oaks Voca.HS | 160 |
100 |
60 |
117.29 |
174.00 |
-56.71 |
| Chapel Forge | 233 |
180 |
53 |
115.27 |
28.90 |
86.37 |
| C. Elizabeth Rieg | 89 |
120 |
-31 |
91.07 |
70.80 |
20.27 |
As these numbers show, overcrowding remains a serious problem at Bowie High and Benjamin Tasker. Due to overcrowding, students are sometimes eating lunch shortly after arriving at school in order to accommodate the large numbers in a cafeteria that was not designed for these increasing numbers. We urge the Council to seek relief for these schools.
SUMMARY
As the preceding
indicates, we see three major areas of concern which we feel are crucial for
the Bowie City Council to focus on in the coming year: Budget, which affects
programs available in the schools; Funding of Other Programs and Initiatives,
which addresses overall operation of our schools, preparation for test success,
and training of our teachers; and School Construction and Repairs, which addresses
classroom overcrowding and providing a comfortable learning environment for
our children.
As noted, it will be difficult to make much progress in these areas unless
we can begin to convince parents, legislators, and businesses that their increased
funding and support is worthwhile. Dr. Hornsby is beginning to focus on the
positives in our schools. This is an important first step. No Child Left Behind
establishes standards and goals to ensure that ALL children receive a basic
education that will make them self-sufficient in an increasingly complex world.
Achieving the goals of No Child Left Behind will require increased funding,
resources, and commitment by all involved parties to assure success. This
we should do! This we must do!
REFERENCES
1. Rouse,
Cecilia Elena, "Private School Vouchers and Student Achievement: An Evaluation
of
the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program," Princeton University, September
1997
2. The Boston Globe, October 17, 2003.
3. Metropolitan
Area Boards of Education (MABE) by the Parents United for the DC Public
Schools. (Figures include most federal grant funding but not all state-level
in-kind expenses,
such as summer school & special education tuition) .
4. Maryland
State Department of Education.
http://www.msde.state.md.us/divisions/dld/pdf/nclb%20slide%20show%20june%202003.webdocs.ppt